Asrock X370 Gaming X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming X  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 22:35
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 77
1-Core 91
2-Core 178
66% 115 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 606
56% 465 Pts
64-Core 839
52% 839 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 70.2
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 62.6
57% 68 fps
MRender 83.7
Gravity 73.6
Splatting 70.8
62% 76 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
P3-256 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T170810a
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 458
Mixed 385
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 28.6
116% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 109
110% 173 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 98%
Drevo X1 pro 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: Q0810B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 380 409 414 417 418 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Read 439
Write 415
Mixed 322
SusWrite 400
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 80.4
4K Mixed 29.7
108% 42.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 221
182% 258 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
13GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 144 115 122 127 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 166
Write 132
Mixed 79.3
SusWrite 130
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
15GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.1 4.4 4 4.5 4.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 5.5
Mixed 7
SusWrite 4.5
13% 13.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 2.5
132% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 44.3
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 35.7
114% 39.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 40.7
SC Mixed 25.6
85% 29.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 107%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Gaming X Builds (Compare 235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $398
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback