Asrock H55M

Performance Results


Gaming 43% Speed boat	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	60.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H55M (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100806
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 10 '19 at 17:47
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	18%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X3470 8,730 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 79.8 2-Core 161 67% 111 Pts	4-Core 255 8-Core 338 38% 296 Pts	64-Core 393 24% 393 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60.5% Good	Lighting 77 Reflection 76 Parallax 65.4 63% 72.8 fps	MRender 69.3 Gravity 68.8 Splatting 68 56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 40 51 46 46 49 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48.5% Average	Read 245 Write 204 Mixed 194 SusWrite 74 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 19.6 88% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 120 106% 157 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 85%
Kingdian S370 256GB 187 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 36GB free Firmware: 02000006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 101 77 79 71 78 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 195 Write 106 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 106 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 18.6 4K Mixed 10 45% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 17 DQ Mixed 15.8 12% 16.3 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 94%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20 41,230 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 97GB free Firmware: 01.03E01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 66 65 66 67 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 57.5 Write 60.7 Mixed 43 SusWrite 67.1 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 0, 0 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	40.4% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 11.4 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H55M Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H55M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	8x
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	6x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	6x

GPU
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	5x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	4x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	3x

SSD
2.5" 120GBSSDBench 60%, 33 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	14x
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16