Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H81M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150526
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 17:24
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3-$217
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Memory 94.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 184
76% 128 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 400
51% 386 Pts
64-Core 404
25% 404 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Lighting 36.4
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 43.8
30% 38 fps
MRender 47.1
Gravity 43.5
Splatting 34.3
33% 41.6 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 480
Mixed 372
101% 452 MB/s
4K Read 49.4
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 64.1
231% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 229
208% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
776GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 118 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 109
Write 106
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 119
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 112%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
168GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 88 87 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 82
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 87.3
58% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 50%
Great: 55%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7
58GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 142
Write 87.5
Mixed 100
132% 110 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 3.5
243% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 20.4
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 58
69% 58 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,847 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback