| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 24.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171204 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 10 '19 at 17:14 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | CZE-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.5%
Above average
|
59% 102 Pts
|
46% 386 Pts
|
30% 490 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Asus(1043 054B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1187 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
|
15.8%
Very poor
|
12% 19.7 fps
|
24% 28.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
112GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 85 48 45 44 3.7 MB/s
|
24.6%
Poor
|
18% 85 MB/s
|
42% 13.6 MB/s
|
14% 19.3 MB/s
|
|
|
56% 74.9 MB/s
|
118% 0.8 MB/s
| ||
|
Wilk GOODRAM 8GB
5GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
4% 3.37 MB/s
|
3% 0.27 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.7%
Good
|
75% 26.3 GB/s
|
46% 16.1 GB/s
|
37% 109 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,034 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,461x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,304x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 734x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 653x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 103% - Outstanding | Total price: $322 |