MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics56.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7751
MotherboardMSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751)  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131009
Uptime20.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 16:57
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2700K-$89
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 52.5
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 86
43% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 201
8-Core 235
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 44%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.4% Above average
Lighting 69.6
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 62.2
57% 67.9 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 69.6
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 210 206 205 204 205 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 413
Write 223
Mixed 222
SusWrite 207
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 25.1
87% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 209
DQ Mixed 183
152% 220 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 128%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 98 99 97 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 96.6
71% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
842GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 86 88 86 88 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 176
Write 186
Mixed 74.3
SusWrite 87.4
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
331GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 82 80 82 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
41% Average
Read 60.7
Write 64.5
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 81.9
47% 64 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41%
Great: 58%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
443GB free
Firmware: CR100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 44
Write 43
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 45.9
31% 41.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 44%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
144GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 46 47 47 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 45.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 46.7
28% 37.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLE4G3D1608DE1TX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32.6% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 12
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.1
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) Builds (Compare 610 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-GD65 (MS-7751) - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $657
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback