Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	58.5% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 73 2-Core 129 58% 94.3 Pts	4-Core 213 8-Core 212 28% 212 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21FA) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 5.85 Parallax 3.03 4% 4.43 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.39 5% 5.33 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$140 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: LF1i SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 165 163 164 165 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Read 290 Write 205 Mixed 218 SusWrite 163 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 21.7 74% 26.6 MB/s	DQ Read 292 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 219 172% 239 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 15GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5.3 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 33.9 Write 4.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 4.7 12% 12.3 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.5 124% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB 2,461 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 18.7 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16.7 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 15.6 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16