Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121128
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 00:53
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 200
72% 127 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 344
49% 358 Pts
64-Core 383
24% 383 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
EVGA(3842 2670) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.9% Poor
Lighting 30.6
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 39.8
25% 34.2 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 33
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
9GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 90 75 71 76 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 176
Write 110
Mixed 141
SusWrite 77.6
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 26.6
93% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 143
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 110
88% 125 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 61%
WD Black 500GB (2012)-$47
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 102
Mixed 57.7
66% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
117GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 83 85 84 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 96.2
Write 92.3
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 83.5
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 84%
General USB Flash Disk 8GB
0GB free, PID 800e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.6
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.5
8% 7.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML4GX3M1A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,000 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $581
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback