User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory42GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 42GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Systemempty empty
MotherboardTYAN S7012
Memory35.9 GB free of 42 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110923
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 09 '19 at 14:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon W5580
CPU 0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 72
2-Core 168
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 478
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8555) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32.7
Reflection 31.7
Parallax 28.5
27% 31 fps
MRender 36
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 31.8
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 56 52 61 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Read 144
Write 147
Mixed 118
SusWrite 56
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 30.1
4K Mixed 15.2
55% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 32.3
DQ Write 74.8
DQ Mixed 37.3
33% 48.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
18GB free
Firmware: AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 46 38 28 21 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 60
Write 81
Mixed 47
SusWrite 34.1
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 68%
Hitachi HDS5C303 3TB
118GB free
Firmware: A800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 64 63 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 67.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 38.3
SusWrite 64.2
44% 59.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18JSF25672PY-1G4D1 Samsung M392B5670EH1-CH9 Samsung M392B5670EH1-CH9 Hynix HMT125R7AFP4C-H9 Samsung M392B5670EH1-CH9 18KDF25672PZ-1G4F1 Hynix HMT125R7AFP4C-H9 Samsung M392B5670EH1-CH9 Samsung M392B5670EH1-CH9 Samsung M39... 42GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback