Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 25% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7-OP (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180403
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 07 '19 at 18:16
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	98.9% Outstanding	Memory 97.9 1-Core 143 2-Core 282 97% 174 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 888 87% 712 Pts	64-Core 1,119 69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440 13,860 User benchmarks, average bench 16% HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.30 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 16.5 Parallax 18.8 18% 19.3 fps	MRender 23.3 Gravity 19.8 Splatting 16.3 16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 104GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 392 338 305 272 266 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 412 Mixed 338 SusWrite 336 87% 390 MB/s	4K Read 44 4K Write 106 4K Mixed 56.6 195% 68.7 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 331 252% 341 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 124%
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB 6,924 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 731GB free Firmware: 16.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 269 265 271 193 252 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 382GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 98 99 98 98 MB/s Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	49.5% Average	Read 73.6 Write 70.3 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 98.4 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 179 180 180 182 182 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 120 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 177 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB 20,017 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	MC Read 39.2 MC Write 38.4 MC Mixed 27.2 100% 34.9 GB/s	SC Read 23.4 SC Write 39.4 SC Mixed 31.9 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 46.5 86% 46.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 122%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	24x
MEMPEK1W032GA 29GBIntelBench 263%, 1,656 samples	20x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	15x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	24x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	23x
AR32C16S8K2SU416R 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 3,827 samples	11x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $827

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16