| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Casper Casper Nirvana Notebook |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk, |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20130824 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 06 '19 at 17:20 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
62.9%
Good
|
64% 103 Pts
|
31% 231 Pts
|
14% 235 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4264
|
||||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
577GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 61 50 36 79 86 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
36% 49.6 MB/s
|
87% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
190GB free, PID b202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 68 67 69 70 72 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
98% 74.8 MB/s
|
84% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nanya M2S4G64CC88B4N-DI 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
54.9%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
56% 71.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,347 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples | 274x |
| Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples | 218x |
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 214x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 596x |
| HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples | 320x |
| HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples | 188x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |