PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME (all builds) |
Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140514 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Jan 06 '19 at 16:45 |
Run Duration | 171 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 35% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3960X
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
Asus(1043 84B7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
38%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
151GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 350 364 336 341 166 144 MB/s
|
85.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150
54GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 361 340 378 354 368 MB/s
|
91.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
99GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 81 87 80 86 MB/s
|
51.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD5003ABYZ-011FA0 500GB
128GB free
Firmware: 01.01S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 62 67 62 66 MB/s
|
46.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Dominator DDR3 2400 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
44.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples | 527x |
Core i7-4930KIntel $100Bench 77%, 22,204 samples | 272x |
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples | 180x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 122x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 115x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 112x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 59% - Above average | Total price: $1,178 |