Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMonster TULPAR T5 V13.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T5 V13.1
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170705
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJan 06 '19 at 12:45
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 98.8
2-Core 178
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 555
55% 447 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 8503) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Lighting 4.57
Reflection 70.1
Parallax 5.75
4% 26.8 fps
MRender 6.57
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 11.6
7% 7.89 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GB
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0MU020
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 420
Mixed 357
89% 399 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 62.5
4K Mixed 19.8
90% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 148
114% 155 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS824A.C8FAD1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.3% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.3
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 8.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T5 V13.1 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

System: Monster TULPAR T5 V13.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback