MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics54.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180806
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 06 '19 at 05:28
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 177
63% 113 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 546
53% 436 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 61%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 72.1
Parallax 95.3
54% 78 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 59
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
466GB free
Firmware: R0802A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1428 1488 1483 1462 777 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,370
Mixed 1067
SusWrite 1,145
288% 1,284 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 50.9
225% 88.4 MB/s
DQ Read 901
DQ Write 1,006
DQ Mixed 86.3
305% 664 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 242%
Great: 248%
Intel 330 Series 60GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 46 44 49 47 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28% Poor
Read 132
Write 50.2
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 47.2
18% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 15.5
61% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 39.9
DQ Write 17.2
DQ Mixed 25.4
20% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 28%
Great: 67%
Fusion-io ioDrive2 1.30TB
1TB free
Firmware: 7.1.15 rev 110356 Public
SusWrite @10s intervals: 628 657 655 646 678 688 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
93GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 69 68 67 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 58.5
Write 55.5
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 67.4
42% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3300622AS 300GB-$130
5GB free
Firmware: 3.AAH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 32 33 31 38 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 41.8
Write 25.2
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 33.8
26% 34.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$57
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.9% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10.9
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $558
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback