| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-CS (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160517 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '19 at 22:27 |
| Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-6098P
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
|
70.5%
Very good
|
79% 139 Pts
|
42% 317 Pts
|
20% 316 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
38% 58.6 fps
|
45% 55.2 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 121 134 117 102 88 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
75% 103 MB/s
|
123% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.7%
Below average
|
35% 12.3 GB/s
|
22% 7.8 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 897 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 245x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 145x |
| Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples | 92x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 116x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 106x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |