Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 05 '19 at 14:13
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 108 2-Core 208 73% 130 Pts	4-Core 429 8-Core 842 75% 635 Pts	64-Core 1,182 73% 1,182 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Sapphire(174B E347) CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54% Above average	Lighting 67.9 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 84.2 55% 73.2 fps	MRender 66.5 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 56.3 52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 128GB-$30 32,167 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0801C SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 38 48 46 37 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 381 Write 217 Mixed 317 SusWrite 58 54% 243 MB/s	4K Read 27.6 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 31.2 109% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 31.2 DQ Mixed 36.9 39% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 107%
Hitachi HDT721032SLA360 320GB-$26 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 232GB free Firmware: ST2OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 88 87 86 86 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 88.2 Write 90.3 Mixed 47.3 SusWrite 86.3 57% 78 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 59%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 224GB free Firmware: 18.01H18 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 103 104 104 101 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 87.2 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 102 64% 87 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 146 148 148 149 149 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 139 Write 134 Mixed 80.8 SusWrite 148 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 84%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 11,405 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 29GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 22 26 26 31 25 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 111 Write 21.3 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 26.7 58% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 2.3 146% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3200 2x8GB 16,678 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	78.8% Very good	MC Read 31.9 MC Write 29.7 MC Mixed 21 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 22.7 SC Write 35.1 SC Mixed 26.4 80% 28.1 GB/s	Latency 90.1 44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $734

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)