| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock H81M-HDS (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150723 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 05 '19 at 03:09 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55%
Above average
|
65% 110 Pts
|
21% 160 Pts
|
10% 166 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0402) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3186
|
2.19%
Terrible
|
2% 2.96 fps
|
2% 2.51 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 98 94 119 132 128 MB/s
|
74.3%
Very good
|
91% 124 MB/s
|
197% 1.47 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD160HJ 160GB
149GB free
Firmware: BF100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 75 76 75 76 76 MB/s
|
43.1%
Average
|
51% 69.7 MB/s
|
158% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.9%
Poor
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
24% 8.53 GB/s
|
54% 74.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-HDS Builds (Compare 1,129 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HDS - $147
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 173x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 158x |
| Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 100x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 133x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 57x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $325 |