Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	30% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo L7300 22 User benchmarks, average bench 30% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Memory 60.3 1-Core 16 2-Core 30.9 27% 35.7 Pts	4-Core 29.9 8-Core 30.5 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 31.1 2% 31.1 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Mobile Intel 965 Express Chipset Family 3,066 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Legend(17AA 20B5) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2697 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.15 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.2 fps	Splatting 0.3 0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M4 64GB-$92 7,336 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 070H SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 64 74 80 60 58 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30% Below average	Read 216 Write 90.3 Mixed 117 SusWrite 70.5 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 20.8 4K Mixed 10.1 44% 14.7 MB/s	DQ Read 98.2 DQ Write 77.5 DQ Mixed 27.9 37% 67.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 65%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 35GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 11 7.2 8.8 7.2 8.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 30.4 Write 12.2 Mixed 14.2 SusWrite 9.6 20% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1.1 84% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 127 32% 127 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16