| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 3.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 22.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP900X4C-A06US |
| Memory | 1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120823 |
| Uptime | 4.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 10 '16 at 13:17 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 86% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz
|
47.2%
Average
|
46% 68 Pts
|
14% 102 Pts
|
8% 127 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2712
|
3.09%
Terrible
|
3% 3.4 fps
|
4% 4.75 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk U100 SMG2 126GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10.5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
22.1%
Poor
|
31% 148 MB/s
|
16% 5.56 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.8%
Above average
|
55% 19.2 GB/s
|
31% 11 GB/s
|
45% 89.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 35x |
| Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-2537MIntelBench 44%, 490 samples | 1x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 58x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $225 |