Asus M4A87TD EVO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101116
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 10 '16 at 09:37
Run Duration	120 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 59.2 2-Core 118 54% 86.2 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 231 31% 234 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 6790 4,043 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1003 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Lighting 16.6 Reflection 14.7 Parallax 14.4 14% 15.2 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 16.7 11% 13.6 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 12%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100 46,066 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 506ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 104 104 7370996 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 111188113369086 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3678 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 2852 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 80 73019686943 (C2) HDA temperature 31 80 73019686943 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 7370996 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 7370996 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 7370996 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 97 97 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 17429 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8583 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8583 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14374	46.3% Average	Read 301 Write 125 Mixed 149 42% 192 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 70.3 4K Mixed 11.5 82% 33.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 13.6 26% 48.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 87%
Toshiba MG03ACA100 1TB 1,552 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 187GB free Firmware: FL1A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 4406 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 474 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 1605 (0A) Spinup retry count 109 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 473 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 9 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 498 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 184684707871 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 97 97 1590 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 105 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	48.5% Average	Read 83.9 Write 84.6 Mixed 52.5 55% 73.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.77 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.004 75% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1600EL Series 1600EL Series Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 533, 533, 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.9% Below average	MC Read 12.9 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 11.1 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO

CPU
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	25x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	19x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples	6x
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	6x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	3x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	4x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX 16GBUnknownBench 29%, 5 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $241

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16