Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H77M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '19 at 04:50
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 103
2-Core 205
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 516
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 511
32% 511 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.5% Good
Lighting 78.9
Reflection 79.1
Parallax 68.8
64% 75.6 fps
MRender 70.9
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 72.1
59% 72.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,407
Write 3,198
Mixed 3,889
921% 4,165 MB/s
4K Read 592
4K Write 306
4K Mixed 68
1,147% 322 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,059
678% 746 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
5GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 198
Write 212
Mixed 197
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 57.6
DQ Mixed 41.3
32% 44.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 129 132 129 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 50
Write 117
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 131
130% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
184% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
156GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Read 25.5
Write 26.3
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 19.7
32% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.4
150% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 50%
WD 3200BEV External 320GB
104GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 25.8
SusWrite 41
49% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 20%
WD Elements 1TB
475GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 19 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 28
Write 22.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 18.3
30% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
60% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-039.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.5% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 64
62% 64 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H77M-D3H Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H77M-D3H - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $424
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback