Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2760QM-$130 10,423 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	69.6% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 174 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 400 44% 345 Pts	64-Core 403 25% 403 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 69.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0493) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.15% Terrible	Lighting 2.37 Reflection 3.77 Parallax 1.59 2% 2.58 fps	MRender 3.62 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 4.22 3% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 240GB 1,204 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 600A SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 133 143 109 141 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	52.6% Above average	Read 294 Write 202 Mixed 222 SusWrite 134 48% 213 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 45.7 4K Mixed 23.9 84% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 18.9 50% 106 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 52.6% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 12GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 17 GB/s	SC Read 13.9 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 71.1 56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,631x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	354x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	149x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16