PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MSI MS-7846 |
Motherboard | MSI H97M-E35 (MS-7846) (all builds) |
Memory | 8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140919 |
Uptime | 8.4 Days |
Run Date | Jan 02 '19 at 10:09 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 28% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.3%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 977 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.9.3
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.2%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF3000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 34 51 63 81 97 MB/s
|
31.3%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
171GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 119 123 125 105 119 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT1TX0. 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
48.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 54x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 39x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 26x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 27x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 22x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 20x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $512 |