PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Apple MacPro1,1 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Apple Mac-F4208DC8 |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20070702 |
Uptime | 1.6 Days |
Run Date | Jan 02 '19 at 01:35 |
Run Duration | 143 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5365
CPU-A ( 0 ), 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1598 MHz, MLim: 1852 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.6%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$25
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 82 87 90 94 84 MB/s
|
34.7%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate ST3500630AS P 500GB
175GB free
Firmware: 3.BTG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
|
38.8%
Below average
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA660 500GB
355GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 90 91 95 95 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon 51501stBench 40%, 627 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon 51601stBench 43%, 632 samples | 12x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X53551stBench 42%, 426 samples | 8x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 7300 GTNvidiaBench 0%, 1,554 samples | 8x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 7x |
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples | 3x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |