Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 6% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5250-$90 962 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Memory 20.8 1-Core 15.4 2-Core 19.2 13% 18.5 Pts	4-Core 23.3 8-Core 23.9 3% 23.6 Pts	64-Core 29.8 2% 29.8 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X2300 386 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 1449) 64MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.16% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 0.58 Parallax 0.34 0% 0.41 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.16% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00 160GB-$82 3,253 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 55GB free (System drive) Firmware: SB4OC70P SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 14 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.77% Terrible	Read 6.7 Write 10.4 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 13 7% 9.85 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.77% Great: 25%
ST925082 7AS 250GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 39GB free, PID 0379 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 18 17 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8% Terrible	Read 16.1 Write 15.8 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 15.7 22% 15.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.02% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 1.93 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 1.3 4% 1.5 GB/s	Latency 315 13% 315 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.02% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16