| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 73.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160107 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 01 '19 at 15:14 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | BEL-User |
| Background CPU | 55% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
72.5%
Very good
|
64% 110 Pts
|
44% 348 Pts
|
26% 417 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
73.8%
Very good
|
71% 99.6 fps
|
79% 96.8 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 131 145 177 163 161 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
39% 175 MB/s
|
55% 17.7 MB/s
|
105% 191 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GB-$125
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.4%
Average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
60% 66.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,313 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples | 1,764x |
| Core i5-6600KIntel $81Bench 72%, 342,244 samples | 539x |
| Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 274x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 454x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 349x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 242x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 99% - Outstanding | Total price: $736 |