| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H81M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150617 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 01 '19 at 10:10 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | THA-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
75.4%
Very good
|
75% 132 Pts
|
53% 399 Pts
|
25% 408 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
115%
Outstanding
|
124% 167 fps
|
107% 132 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 580ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 103 137 139 136 137 MB/s
|
74.8%
Very good
|
44% 199 MB/s
|
150% 56.7 MB/s
|
144% 206 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2009)-$50
367GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 65 67 64 67 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
42% 57 MB/s
|
128% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Team Xtreem-LV-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51%
Above average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
52% 77 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H81M-D Builds (Compare 824 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H81M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 146x |
| Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples | 81x |
| Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples | 67x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 82x |
| HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples | 79x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 72x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $237 |