HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 11 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory5.6 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 84.1
46% 67.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 371
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 598
40% 598 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 121
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 124
32% 109 fps
MRender 82.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 0.1
32% 66.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32%
Great: 34%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 88 80 95 103 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 77
SusWrite 94.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 80%
Seagate Portable 1TB
65GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 18.6
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 16%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
300GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 18.5
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $32
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $192Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $43
Intel Core i5-9400F $151Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $319Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $47
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $60SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback