HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.5%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory5.6 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 31 '18 at 09:55
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
35.5% Below average
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 84.1
28% 60.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 371
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 598
40% 598 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$150
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Lighting 121
Reflection 82.6
Parallax 124
38% 109 fps
MRender 82.3
Gravity 118
Splatting 0.1
32% 66.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 42%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 88 80 95 103 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 113
Write 118
Mixed 77
SusWrite 94.3
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 80%
Seagate Portable 1TB
65GB free, PID 2101
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.9% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 18.6
32% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.9%
Great: 16%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
300GB free, PID a200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 25.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 18.5
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 ID:80 2C 18JSF25672AZ-1G4F1 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 16.9
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,374 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $86
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback