Biostar TB250-BTC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TB250-BTC  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 17:47
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 97%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$36
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
44.9% Average
Memory 64.6
1-Core 69.4
2-Core 113
50% 82.4 Pts
4-Core 149
8-Core 139
20% 144 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
Asus(1043 047E) 3GB
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1300 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 53.5
35% 42.7 fps
MRender 28.8
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 38.2
30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 363
Write 349
Mixed 239
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 34.8
89% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 170
171% 277 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
NT-64 63GB
7GB free
Firmware: T170317d
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 257
Write 278
Mixed 262
60% 266 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 18.5
100% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 53.3
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 72.3
80% 127 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 64%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
952GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 62 62 63 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 84.7
Write 97.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 62
54% 73.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
742GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 134 129 133 135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 134
Write 128
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 132
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 76%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905678-024.A00G 9905678-041.A00G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 16.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TB250-BTC Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar TB250-BTC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $229
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback