Asus Z97-AR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z97-AR  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '18 at 11:13
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 163
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 352
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
39.4% Below average
Lighting 51.2
Reflection 34
Parallax 68.7
42% 51.3 fps
MRender 32.5
Gravity 52.5
Splatting 42.2
35% 42.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 579 428 307 308 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 623
Write 568
Mixed 540
SusWrite 405
120% 534 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 71.9
233% 80.3 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 997
674% 818 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 155%
Great: 280%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
210GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 334 155 101 103 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
37.8% Below average
Read 263
Write 106
Mixed 88
SusWrite 181
35% 160 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 19.1
4K Mixed 12.3
51% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 16
12% 16.2 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
715GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 171 171 172 172 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 180
Mixed 101
SusWrite 171
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
244% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 1TB
344GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 114 115 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
46.2% Average
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 114
125% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 46.2%
Great: 43%
ST916082 1A 160GB
125GB free, PID 6830
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 35.5
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 36
45% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CM3B8G2C1600L11 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 0215 CM3B8G2C1600L11 1315 BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 17.8
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-AR Builds (Compare 1,163 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-AR - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $788
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback