HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime10 Days
Run DateDec 29 '18 at 23:00
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 73
2-Core 139
58% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 416
41% 333 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Lighting 51.8
Reflection 48.2
Parallax 42.8
42% 47.6 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 44.4
Splatting 39.2
33% 40.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 273 364 371 393 403 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 450
Mixed 383
SusWrite 353
93% 413 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 63.3
4K Mixed 38
124% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 275
207% 277 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
2TB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 100 95 90 82 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 127
Write 110
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 89.7
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 160 151 159 149 160 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 114
Write 130
Mixed 124
SusWrite 154
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
313% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 117 123 119 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 78.5
Write 120
Mixed 106
SusWrite 122
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
293% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 90%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 135 131 138 130 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 146
Write 130
Mixed 118
SusWrite 133
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 85%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 77 81 86 79 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 117
Write 97.3
Mixed 60.9
SusWrite 80.4
115% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
102% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 60%
WD My Book Essentials 2TB
744GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 25.9
Write 24
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 17.3
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 105 109 104 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 152
Write 124
Mixed 69.4
SusWrite 102
144% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.3
116% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 98%
WD My Book 1TB
931GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 17 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 23.3
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 17.6
30% 22.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GB
8 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.4% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 22.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,749 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback