Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4712MQ 5,324 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	73.4% Very good	Memory 84.3 1-Core 92.6 2-Core 182 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 341 8-Core 468 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 475 29% 475 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 840M 20,978 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Acer(1025 0922) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1723 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Lighting 15.3 Reflection 11.4 Parallax 11.9 12% 12.9 fps	MRender 6.81 Gravity 15 Splatting 9.83 9% 10.5 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,578 Write 4,706 Mixed 4,828 1,122% 5,037 MB/s	4K Read 495 4K Write 229 4K Mixed 284 1,236% 336 MB/s	DQ Read 990 DQ Write 656 DQ Mixed 739 574% 795 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 405GB free Firmware: JB0OA3U0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 106 108 107 108 107 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 106 Write 102 Mixed 30 SusWrite 106 62% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-018.A00LF 9905428-435.A00LF 16GB 91 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.6 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.7 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 17.3 SC Mixed 19.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 73 55% 73 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	156x
GeForce 840MNvidiaBench 9%, 20,978 samples	35x
GTX 940MNvidiaBench 9%, 15,731 samples	23x

RAM
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	18x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 26,681 samples	17x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	9x

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16