| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A97 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20121025 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 29 '18 at 17:53 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
55.5%
Above average
|
51% 80.6 Pts
|
27% 214 Pts
|
16% 251 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Asus(1043 841F) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.65
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.9%
Very poor
|
13% 30.9 fps
|
28% 35.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SUV400S37240G 240GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 139 66 30 51 34 MB/s
|
38.5%
Below average
|
32% 140 MB/s
|
61% 24 MB/s
|
123% 202 MB/s
|
|
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 109 110 108 111 109 MB/s
|
65.2%
Good
|
77% 104 MB/s
|
148% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
41.8%
Average
|
43% 15.1 GB/s
|
26% 8.93 GB/s
|
47% 84.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A97 Builds (Compare 316 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A97 - $89
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 52x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 43x |
| FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples | 41x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 18x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 16x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $499 |