Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	7.89% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4300-$73 55,454 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 66.2 2-Core 120 55% 88.6 Pts	4-Core 201 8-Core 203 27% 202 Pts	64-Core 204 13% 204 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Lighting 38.1 Reflection 28.9 Parallax 40.9 31% 35.9 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 37.2 Splatting 35.9 30% 36.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWM110 1TB 568 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: HEF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 57 40 57 51 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	7.89% Terrible	Read 59.3 Write 70.6 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 50.5 12% 52.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 10.4 4K Mixed 1 7% 3.9 MB/s	DQ Read 0.8 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 2.9 4% 5.97 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.89% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 8GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 13 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 10.7 27% 9.43 GB/s	Latency 81.6 49% 81.6 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 27%, 3,584 samples	11x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 16GBUnknownBench 39%, 564 samples	8x

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16