| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140324 |
| Uptime | 2.1 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 27 '18 at 15:05 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 39% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
51.1%
Above average
|
49% 74.9 Pts
|
19% 151 Pts
|
10% 164 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.5%
Above average
|
56% 67.3 fps
|
54% 65.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CR100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 26 27 31 30 MB/s
|
26.4%
Poor
|
34% 45.5 MB/s
|
114% 0.8 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
564GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
32% 44.6 MB/s
|
101% 0.57 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Patriot PSD38G16002 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
19.1%
Very poor
|
17% 5.8 GB/s
|
14% 5.07 GB/s
|
48% 82.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A58M-HD2 Builds (Compare 46 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A58M-HD2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-6600K APUAMD $88Bench 50%, 21,890 samples | 14x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 6x |
| A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 8570DAMDBench 4%, 8,328 samples | 5x |
| GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples | 4x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $116 |