| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A87TD EVO (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110308 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 27 '18 at 13:45 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.5%
Good
|
53% 80.2 Pts
|
28% 227 Pts
|
18% 287 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 6870
Sapphire(174B E178) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
17.2%
Very poor
|
19% 20.2 fps
|
14% 16.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 62 82 137 180 138 MB/s
|
36.1%
Below average
|
30% 139 MB/s
|
45% 12.7 MB/s
|
11% 18.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
205GB free
Firmware: CC37
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 102 105 105 104 MB/s
|
64.7%
Good
|
76% 104 MB/s
|
178% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 800 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.8%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.73 GB/s
|
60% 66.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A87TD EVO Builds (Compare 136 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD EVO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 36x |
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 25x |
| Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples | 19x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
| R9 270XAMD $199Bench 27%, 77,943 samples | 6x |
| HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $241 |