Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 104% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 (all builds)
Memory	48.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171212
Uptime	5.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 27 '18 at 04:31
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 265 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 456 8-Core 856 78% 656 Pts	64-Core 1,144 71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (72^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	128% Outstanding	Lighting 176 Reflection 186 Parallax 181 143% 181 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 179 Splatting 128 117% 145 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 38,097 User benchmarks, average bench 241% 422GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1045 892 1013 1043 1032 1009 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	193% Outstanding	Read 1,133 Write 1,189 Mixed 616 SusWrite 1,006 222% 986 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 83 4K Mixed 38 139% 50.6 MB/s	DQ Read 1,065 DQ Write 910 DQ Mixed 934 715% 970 MB/s
Poor: 157% ↑ This bench: 193% Great: 302%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200 31,545 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 379GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 306 334 346 349 345 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 331 Write 334 Mixed 276 SusWrite 334 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 16.9 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 28.7 97% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 180 154% 219 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 107%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200 7,034 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 1GB free Firmware: R201 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 334 Write 216 Mixed 236 58% 262 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 64 4K Mixed 28.9 103% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 301 DQ Write 220 DQ Mixed 225 178% 249 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 4x16GB 624 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.4% Good	MC Read 21.9 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.8 66% 23 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 19.9 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 130%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 112%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 102%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	210x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	168x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	158x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $127Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	186x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	173x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	127x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $1,062

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16