Asus K52JT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus K52JT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52JT
Memory1.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 21:12
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 Q 740-$190
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 71
2-Core 94.1
58% 86 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 219
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3265GSXN 320GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GH101M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 59 59 47 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
37% Below average
Read 73
Write 78.6
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 55.9
43% 59.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.3
76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 1x2GB
1 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.7
21% 7.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52JT Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52JT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $232
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback