Asus F3JP

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus F3JP  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK F3JP
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070523
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '18 at 14:04
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 T5500-$18
Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 19
2-Core 33.2
29% 38.8 Pts
4-Core 37.2
8-Core 36.7
5% 37 Pts
64-Core 37.9
2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700
Asus(1043 1242)
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.33.0.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.13% Terrible
Lighting 0.23
Reflection 0.27
Parallax 0.16
0% 0.22 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.13%
Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM250JI 250GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HS100-08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 37 17 15 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 42.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 25.7
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.63 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 3.2
SC Mixed 2.7
9% 3.2 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback