Asrock N68-VS3 FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock N68-VS3 FX (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111114
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 26 '18 at 03:22
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	48%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri) 19,471 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Memory 60.7 1-Core 36.7 2-Core 81.8 38% 59.7 Pts	4-Core 69.8 8-Core 80.8 10% 75.3 Pts	64-Core 80.1 5% 80.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.18% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.96 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.65 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.87 1% 1.59 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.18% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 190 Write 97.5 Mixed 114 30% 134 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 19.3 4K Mixed 10.1 43% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 20.1 DQ Write 36 DQ Mixed 18.7 17% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 127GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 71 62 67 85 87 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.2% Average	Read 77.5 Write 67 Mixed 50.7 SusWrite 69.3 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.8 5.2 5 5.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	2.6% Terrible	Read 6.5 Write 5 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 4.8 7% 5.25 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 2.6% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905584-017.A00LF 99U5471-020.A00LF 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 533, 533 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 8.7 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 22% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N68-VS3 FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-VS3 FX

CPU
FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples	18x
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	15x
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	16x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
GP-GSTFS311 120GBGigabyteBench 30%, 201 samples	8x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	3x
99U5471-040.A00LF 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 2,012 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16