Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	48% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161118
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 24 '18 at 19:01
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	58% Above average	Memory 80.6 1-Core 60.4 2-Core 122 54% 87.7 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 346 32% 269 Pts	64-Core 340 21% 340 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD Radeon R3 120GB 3,248 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0422C SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 79 59 40 46 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	48% Average	Read 204 Write 202 Mixed 191 SusWrite 62.5 37% 165 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 51.1 4K Mixed 32.8 108% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 28.6 DQ Write 73.2 DQ Mixed 38.3 33% 46.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 87%
Hitachi HDT721016SLA380 160GB-$38 3,190 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 23GB free Firmware: ST1OA31B SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 80 60 47 49 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	43% Average	Read 85.2 Write 84.7 Mixed 43 SusWrite 64.4 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 251GB free Firmware: MS2OA610 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 8.2 7.8 9.2 9.4 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Read 90.8 Write 6 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 8.5 21% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 60% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 99%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 127GB free Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 10 12 11 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 87 Write 87.7 Mixed 52.2 SusWrite 10.8 44% 59.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.5% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11 27% 9.4 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M PLUS/USB3

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	433x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	294x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	176x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	177x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	86x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	84x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	60x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	43x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	29x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	326x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	183x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	173x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $144

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $185	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16