PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 304Ah |
Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100609 |
Uptime | 0.4 Days |
Run Date | Dec 24 '18 at 17:01 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 33% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
41.3%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61
|
5.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 37 38 45 48 41 MB/s
|
41%
Average
|
|||
Seagate ST3250620AS 250GB-$149
114GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 39 41 46 48 42 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 388x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 73x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 60x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 285x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 65x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 56x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 30x |
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples | 18x |
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples | 17x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |