Asus P8Z77-V LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LK  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140321
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 24 '18 at 14:55
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 202
77% 132 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 423
47% 370 Pts
64-Core 482
30% 482 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
Gigabyte(1458 21FA) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 22
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 19.2
18% 18.8 fps
MRender 12.8
Gravity 15.6
Splatting 19.9
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 510 Series 120GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 196 195 185 195 191 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 340
Write 194
Mixed 228
SusWrite 192
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 23.7
4K Mixed 14.8
51% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 51.1
DQ Write 52.4
DQ Mixed 52.1
39% 51.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 60%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
118GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 232 233 233 234 231 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
62.9% Good
Read 243
Write 236
Mixed 213
SusWrite 231
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 29.4
99% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 154
124% 174 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 103%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
739GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 70 68 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 79.3
Write 68
Mixed 49.7
SusWrite 69.1
49% 66.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
804GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 79 74 78 77 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 84.3
Write 63.8
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 76.8
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
820GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 136 135 135 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 121
Write 29.7
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 136
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
218% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 84 84 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
34% Below average
Read 84.7
Write 83
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 83.2
106% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.8
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.9
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V LK Builds (Compare 2,179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LK - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $472
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback