Olidata W240BU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOlidata W240BU  (all builds)
MotherboardOLIDATA W240BU
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110812
Uptime81 Days
Run DateDec 23 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-30
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Memory 44.6
1-Core 14.1
2-Core 25.5
21% 28.1 Pts
4-Core 23.8
8-Core 26.5
3% 25.1 Pts
64-Core 27.2
2% 27.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310
Clevo(1558 4510) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
0.32% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.25
0% 0.89 fps
MRender 1.24
Gravity 0.63
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.07 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.32%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
235GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GN001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 19 32 40 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 28
Write 55.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 29.8
25% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
64% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 2.6
6% 2 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback