Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 85.3 1-Core 96.4 2-Core 192 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 498 53% 422 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 178D) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8859 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 22.5 Reflection 16.3 Parallax 17.3 18% 18.7 fps	MRender 12.3 Gravity 22 Splatting 15.8 14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 16%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hgst HTS721010A9E630 250GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 130GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 229 223 210 214 209 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 496 Write 484 Mixed 400 SusWrite 237 91% 404 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 53 180% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 358 270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 77% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF 12GB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	38.6% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 13.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	699x
GTX 950MNvidiaBench 14%, 38,813 samples	381x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	47x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 46%, 19,666 samples	289x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GBMicronBench 53%, 1,327 samples	90x
8KTF51264HZ-1G9N1 Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 12GBMicronBench 44%, 193 samples	55x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16