Asus M2N68 Plus

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics57.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M2N68 Plus  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100610
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 21 '18 at 21:46
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 635
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 40.1
2-Core 83.5
44% 66.5 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 170
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Device(7377 0000) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.1% Above average
Lighting 70.7
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 61.9
58% 67.6 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 65.4
Splatting 67.7
56% 68.6 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD Smartbuy 60GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 65 64 72 44 87 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.5% Poor
Read 164
Write 154
Mixed 134
SusWrite 68.3
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 10
37% 10.8 MB/s
DQ Read 94.9
DQ Write 10.4
DQ Mixed 17.8
22% 41 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
302GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 89 87 88 92 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.5% Above average
Read 103
Write 97.5
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 87.1
62% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 60%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.6 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.35% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 1
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.1
6% 6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.35%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 5.9
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2N68 Plus Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2N68 Plus

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback