Medionpc MS-7502

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Medionpc MS-7502 (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR MS-7502
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '18 at 18:59
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	19%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 25.7 2-Core 50.6 31% 44.9 Pts	4-Core 89 8-Core 93.3 12% 91.2 Pts	64-Core 88.8 6% 88.8 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1250 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36.9% Below average	Lighting 38.5 Reflection 63.7 Parallax 76.1 31% 59.5 fps	MRender 64.2 Gravity 60.6 Splatting 52.2 48% 59 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 115GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 225 229 237 205 238 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.3% Good	Read 252 Write 241 Mixed 230 SusWrite 225 53% 237 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 34.4 114% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 37.9 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 93 77% 106 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.3% Great: 124%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 26.8 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 27.1 36% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.7 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.1 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.2 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.03 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-7502 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Medionpc MS-7502

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	29x
Core2 Quad Q8200Intel $49Bench 43%, 19,990 samples	14x
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	9x

GPU
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	12x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
SSDNow KC400 512GBKingston $180Bench 86%, 2,804 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	15x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 28% - Poor

Total price: $280

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16