PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H87 Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140709 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '18 at 14:51 |
Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1231 v3-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
33.5%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
Asus(1043 3004) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.8%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 20 28 27 30 32 MB/s
|
32.1%
Below average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
121GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 151 126 133 119 122 MB/s
|
81.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
42.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 90x |
Core i5-4670Intel $52Bench 66%, 49,019 samples | 49x |
Xeon E3-1230 v3Intel $217Bench 73%, 8,137 samples | 49x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 38x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 37x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 34x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $413 |