PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 0.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5KPL (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20091111 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 19 '18 at 13:24 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 85% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo E4500-$130
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
|
28%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Radeon X1650
Sapphire(174B 0840) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
|
0.57%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 214 221 212 165 216 MB/s
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3320620NS 320GB-$40
29GB free
Firmware: 3.AEK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 50 54 54 54 53 MB/s
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
Corsair Voyager Mini 3.0 64GB
16GB free, PID 1a0c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 17 16 15 17 MB/s
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
12.3%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 5x |
Core2 Duo E4500Intel $130Bench 33%, 8,675 samples | 4x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GSONvidiaBench 5%, 1,167 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 4x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |