Acer Aspire M3985

Performance Results


Gaming 70% Battle cruiser	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	96.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire M3985 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire M3985
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130410
Uptime	1.7 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '18 at 11:46
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 84.4 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 201 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 497 51% 412 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Asus(1043 8620) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (79^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	96.1% Outstanding	Lighting 122 Reflection 136 Parallax 113 100% 124 fps	MRender 97.4 Gravity 124 Splatting 105 89% 109 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 159GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 307 328 325 323 324 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 484 Write 457 Mixed 290 SusWrite 326 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 28.1 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 33.7 114% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 142 161% 277 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 116%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 800GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 126 131 131 128 134 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	60% Good	Read 77.5 Write 37 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 131 58% 78.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 75%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 95 96 97 96 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 99.7 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 95.4 71% 95.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-028.A00LF 2x4GB 3,493 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	46.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 15.9 MC Mixed 14.2 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.3 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 46.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire M3985 Builds (Compare 186 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3985

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	56x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	35x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	25x

GPU
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	26x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	19x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	7x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 3x4GBKingstonBench 35%, 236 samples	6x
HU564404EP0200 2x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 333 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16