Asus M4A78T-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus M4A78T-E  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090520
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '18 at 10:18
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 550
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.4% Average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 44
2-Core 73.2
45% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 80.7
8-Core 83.4
11% 82.1 Pts
64-Core 81.1
5% 81.1 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
MSI(1462 1270) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.04% Terrible
Lighting 6.07
Reflection 8.42
Parallax 1.97
5% 5.49 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 4.07
Splatting 6.3
5% 6.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.04%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 181
Mixed 147
36% 164 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 24.6
90% 31 MB/s
DQ Read 23.5
DQ Write 32.6
DQ Mixed 26.5
20% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 92%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
371GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 67 72 72 65 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
39.8% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 75
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 68.3
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
11GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 69 67 71 71 66 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 86.3
Write 97.3
Mixed 59
SusWrite 68.4
57% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 62%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50
821GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 106 109 109 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 105
Write 3.7
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 108
51% 68.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 88%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
615GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 79 81 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 82.5
Write 81.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 80.6
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 67%
Intenso Ultra Line 64GB
27GB free, PID 0917
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 31 31 32 32 33 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 39
Write 32.2
Mixed 17
SusWrite 30.3
38% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
48% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 28%
SanDisk SDDR-113 32GB
6GB free, PID a7c1
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 4.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 10.4
15% 12 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
35% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.1% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.3
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78T-E Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78T-E - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $177
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback